Diffusion damping
Part of a series on  
Physical cosmology  

Early universe


Components · Structure 

In modern cosmological theory, diffusion damping, also called photon diffusion damping, is a physical process which reduced density inequalities (anisotropies) in the early universe, making the universe itself and the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) more uniform. Around 300,000 years after the Big Bang, during the epoch of recombination, diffusing photons travelled from hot regions of space to cold ones, equalising the temperatures of these regions. This effect is responsible, along with baryon acoustic oscillations, the Doppler effect, and the effects of gravity on electromagnetic radiation, for the eventual formation of galaxies and galaxy clusters, these being the dominant large scale structures which are observed in the universe. It is a damping by diffusion, not of diffusion.^{[2]}
The strength of diffusion damping is calculated by a mathematical expression for the damping factor, which figures into the Boltzmann equation, an equation which describes the amplitude of perturbations in the CMB.^{[3]} The strength of the diffusion damping is chiefly governed by the distance photons travel before being scattered (diffusion length). What affect the diffusion length are primarily the properties of the plasma in question: different sorts of plasma may experience different sorts of diffusion damping. The evolution of a plasma may also affect the damping process.^{[4]} The scale on which diffusion damping works is called the Silk scale and its value corresponds to the size of galaxies of the present day. The mass contained within the Silk scale is called the Silk mass and it corresponds to the mass of the galaxies.^{[5]}
Contents
Introduction
Diffusion damping took place about 13.7 billion years ago, during the stage of the early universe called recombination or matterradiation decoupling. This period occurred between 240,000 and 310,000 years after the Big Bang.^{[6]}^{[7]}^{[nb 1]} Recombination was the stage during which simple atoms, e.g. hydrogen and helium, began to form in the cooling, but still very hot, soup of protons, electrons and photons that composed the universe. Prior to the recombination epoch, this soup, a plasma, was largely opaque to the electromagnetic radiation of photons. This meant that the permanently excited photons were scattered by the protons and electrons too often to travel very far in straight lines.^{[7]} During the recombination epoch, the universe cooled rapidly as free electrons were captured by atomic nuclei; atoms formed from their constituent parts and the universe became transparent: the amount of photon scattering decreased dramatically. Scattering less, photons could diffuse (travel) much greater distances.^{[2]}^{[8]} There is no significant diffusion damping for electrons, which cannot diffuse nearly as far as photons can in similar circumstances. Thus all damping by electron diffusion is negligible when compared to photon diffusion damping.^{[9]}
Acoustic perturbations of initial density fluctuations in the universe made some regions of space hotter and denser than others.^{[10]} These differences in temperature and density are called anisotropies. Photons diffused from the hot, overdense regions of plasma to the cold, underdense ones: they dragged along the protons and electrons: the photons pushed electrons along, and these, in turn, pulled on protons by the Coulomb force. This caused the temperatures and densities of the hot and cold regions to be averaged and the universe became less anisotropic (characteristically various) and more isotropic (characteristically uniform). This reduction in anisotropy is the damping of diffusion damping. Diffusion damping thus damps temperature and density anisotropies in the early universe. With baryonic matter (protons and electrons) escaping the dense areas along with the photons; the temperature and density inequalities were adiabatically damped. That is to say the ratios of photons to baryons remained constant during the damping process.^{[4]}^{[5]}^{[11]}^{[12]}^{[13]}
Photon diffusion was first described in Joseph Silk's 1968 paper entitled "Cosmic BlackBody Radiation and Galaxy Formation",^{[14]} which was published in The Astrophysical Journal. As such, diffusion damping is sometimes also called Silk damping,^{[1]} though this term may apply only to one possible damping scenario.^{[9]}^{[15]}^{[16]} Silk damping was thus named after its discoverer.^{[5]}^{[16]}^{[17]}
Magnitude
The magnitude of diffusion damping is calculated as a damping factor or suppression factor, represented by the symbol Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{D} } , which figures into the Boltzmann equation, an equation which describes the amplitude of perturbations in the CMB.^{[3]} The strength of the diffusion damping is chiefly governed by the distance photons travel before being scattered (diffusion length). What affect the diffusion length are primarily the properties of the plasma in question: different sorts of plasma may experience different sorts of diffusion damping. The evolution of a plasma may also affect the damping process.^{[4]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{D}(\mathit{k}) = \int_{0}^{\eta_0} \dot{\tau}e^{[\mathit{k}/{\mathit{k}_\mathit{D}(\eta)}]^2}\; d\eta. } ^{[3]}
Where:
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \eta } is the conformal time.
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \dot{\tau} } is the "differential optical depth for Thomson scattering". Thomson scattering is the scattering of electromagnetic radiation (light) by charged particles such as electrons.^{[3]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{k} } is the wave number of the wave being suppressed.^{[18]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle (\dot{\tau}e^{[\mathit{k}/{\mathit{k}_\mathit{D}(\eta)}]^2})} is the visibility function.^{[3]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle {\mathit{k}_\mathit{D}}(\eta) = {2\pi}/\lambda_\mathit{D}}
The damping factor Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{D} } , when factored into the Boltzmann equation for the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), reduces the amplitude of perturbations:
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle [\Theta_0+\Psi](\eta_\ast) = [\hat{\Theta}_0+\Psi](\eta_\ast)\mathcal{D}(\mathit{k}). } ^{[3]}
Where:^{[3]}^{[19]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{\eta}_\ast} is the conformal time at decoupling.
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \Theta_0 } is the "monopole [perturbation] of the photon distribution function"^{[3]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \Psi } is a "gravitationalpotential [perturbation] in the Newtonian gauge". The Newtonian gauge is a quantity with importance in the General Theory of Relativity.^{[3]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle [\Theta_0+\Psi](\eta) } is the effective temperature.
Mathematical calculations of the damping factor depend on Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{k}_\mathit{D} } , or the effective diffusion scale, which in turn depends on a crucial value, the diffusion length, Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \lambda_\mathit{D} } .^{[20]} The diffusion length relates how far photons travel during diffusion, and comprises a finite number of short steps in random directions. The average of these steps is the Compton mean free path, and is denoted by Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \lambda_\mathit{C}} . As the direction of these steps are randomly taken, Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \lambda_\mathit{D} } is approximately equal to Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \sqrt{\mathit{N}} \lambda_\mathit{C} } , where Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{N}} is the number of steps the photon takes before the conformal time at decoupling (Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{\eta}_\ast} ).^{[4]}
The diffusion length increases at recombination because the mean free path does, with less photon scattering occurring; this increases the amount of diffusion and damping. The mean free path increases because the electron ionisation fraction, Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{x}_\mathit{e} } , decreases as ionised hydrogen and helium bind with the free, charged electrons. As this occurs, the mean free path increases proportionally: Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \lambda_\mathit{C} \varpropto {(\mathit{x}_\mathit{e} \mathit{n}_\mathit{b})}^{1} } . That is, the mean free path of the photons is inversely proportional to the electron ionisation fraction and the baryon number density (Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{n}_\mathit{b}} ). That means that the more baryons there were, and the more they were ionised, the shorter the average photon could travel before encountering one and being scattered.^{[4]} Small changes to these values before or during recombination can augment the damping effect considerably.^{[4]} This dependence on the baryon density by photon diffusion allows scientists to use analysis of the latter to investigate the former, in addition to the history of ionisation.^{[20]}
The effect of diffusion damping is greatly augmented by the finite width of the surface of last scattering (SLS).^{[21]} The finite width of the SLS means the CMB photons we see were not all emitted at the same time, and the fluctuations we see are not all in phase.^{[22]} It also means that during recombination, the diffusion length changed dramatically, as the ionisation fraction shifted.^{[23]}
Model dependence
In general, diffusion damping produces its effects independent of the cosmological model being studied, thereby masking the effects of other, modeldependent phenomena. This means that without an accurate model of diffusion damping, scientists cannot judge the relative merits of cosmological models, whose theoretical predictions cannot be compared with observational data, this data being obscured by damping effects. For example, the peaks in the power spectrum due to acoustic oscillations are decreased in amplitude by diffusion damping. This deamplification of the power spectrum hides features of the curve, features that would otherwise be more visible.^{[24]}^{[25]}
Though general diffusion damping can damp perturbations in collisionless dark matter simply due to photon dispersion, the term Silk damping applies only to damping of adiabatic models of baryonic matter, which is coupled to the diffusing photons, not dark matter,^{[9]} and diffuses with them.^{[15]}^{[16]} Silk damping is not as significant in models of cosmological development which posit early isocurvature fluctuations (i.e. fluctuations which do not require a constant ratio of baryons and photons). In this case, increases in baryon density do not require a corresponding increases in photon density, and the lower the photon density, the less diffusion there would be: the less diffusion, the less damping.^{[13]} Photon diffusion is not dependent on the causes of the initial fluctuations in the density of the universe.^{[20]}
Effects
Speed
Damping occurs at two different scales, with the process working more quickly over short ranges than over longer distances. Here, a short length is one that is lower than the mean free path of the photons. A long distance is one that is greater than the mean free path, if still less than the diffusion length. On the smaller scale, perturbations are damped almost instantaneously. On the larger scale, anisotropies are decreased more slowly, with significant degradation happening within one unit of Hubble time.^{[9]}
The Silk scale and the Silk mass
Diffusion damping exponentially decreases anisotropies in the CMB on a scale (the Silk scale)^{[5]} much smaller than a degree, or smaller than approximately 3 megaparsecs.^{[1]} This angular scale corresponds to a multipole moment Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{l} \gtrsim 800} .^{[12]}^{[26]} The mass contained within the Silk scale is the silk mass. Numerical evaluations of the Silk mass yield results on the order of Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle 10^{13} } solar masses at recombination^{[27]} and on the order of the mass of a presentday galaxy or galaxy cluster in the current era.^{[5]}^{[9]}
 Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{M}_\mathit{s} \approx \frac{\mathit{m}_\mathit{p} {\mathit{t}_\mathit{rec}}^{3/2}}{\sqrt{\mathit{n}_\mathit{rec} \sigma^3}}.}
As diffusion damping works at this level, scientists say it affects small angles and corresponding anisotropies. This is to be contrasted with other effects which operate on a scale called intermediate Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle 10 \lesssim \mathit{l} \lesssim 100} or large Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathit{l} \lessapprox 10 } . Searches for anisotropies on a small scale are not as difficult as those on larger scales, partly because they may employ groundbased telescopes and their results can be more easily predicted by current theoretical models.^{[28]}
Galaxy formation
Scientists study photon diffusion damping (and CMB anisotropies in general) because of the insight the subject provides into the question, "How did the universe come to be?". Specifically, primordial anisotropies in the temperature and density of the universe are supposed to be the causes of later largescale structure formation. Thus it was the amplification of small perturbations in the prerecombination universe that grew into the galaxies and galaxy clusters of the present era. Diffusion damping made the universe isotropic within distances on the order of the Silk Scale. That this scale corresponds to the size of observed galaxies (when the passage of time is taken into account) implies that diffusion damping is responsible for limiting the size of these galaxies. The theory is that clumps of matter in the early universe became the galaxies that we see today, and the size of these galaxies is related to the temperature and density of the clumps.^{[29]}^{[30]}
Diffusion may also have had a significant effect on the evolution of primordial cosmic magnetic fields, fields which may have been amplified over time to become galactic magnetic fields. However, these cosmic magnetic fields may have been damped by radiative diffusion: just as acoustic oscillations in the plasma were damped by the diffusion of photons, so were magnetosonic waves (waves of ions travelling through a magnetised plasma). This process began before the era of neutrino decoupling and ended at the time of recombination.^{[27]}^{[31]}
See also
Notes
References
 ↑ ^{1.0} ^{1.1} ^{1.2} Bonometto, Gorini & Moschella (20011215), p. 227–8
 ↑ ^{2.0} ^{2.1} Hu, Sugiyama & Silk (19960428), p. 2
 ↑ ^{3.0} ^{3.1} ^{3.2} ^{3.3} ^{3.4} ^{3.5} ^{3.6} ^{3.7} ^{3.8} Jungman, Kamionkowski, Kosowsky & Spergel (19951220), p. 2–4
 ↑ ^{4.0} ^{4.1} ^{4.2} ^{4.3} ^{4.4} ^{4.5} Hu (19950826), p. 12–13
 ↑ ^{5.0} ^{5.1} ^{5.2} ^{5.3} ^{5.4} Madsen (19960515), p. 99–100 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "madsen99101" defined multiple times with different content  ↑ Ryden (2003), p. 158
 ↑ ^{7.0} ^{7.1} Hu (19950826), p. 6
 ↑ Liddle & Lyth (20000413), p. 63, 120
 ↑ ^{9.0} ^{9.1} ^{9.2} ^{9.3} ^{9.4} Padmanabhan (19930625), p. 171–2
 ↑ Harrison (19700515)
 ↑ Longair (20080108), p. 355
 ↑ ^{12.0} ^{12.1} Jetzer & Pretzl (20020731), p. 6
 ↑ ^{13.0} ^{13.1} Rich (20010615), p. 256
 ↑ Silk (19680201)
 ↑ ^{15.0} ^{15.1} Partridge (19950929), p. 302
 ↑ ^{16.0} ^{16.1} ^{16.2} Bonometto, Gorini & Moschella (20011215), p. 55
 ↑ Hu (19940628), p. 15
 ↑ Longair (20080108), p. 450
 ↑ Hu (19950826), p. 146
 ↑ ^{20.0} ^{20.1} ^{20.2} Hu, Sugiyama & Silk (19960428), p. 5
 ↑ (19950826), p. 137
 ↑ Durrer (20010917), p. 5
 ↑ Hu (19950826), pp. 156–7
 ↑ Hu (19950826), p. 136–8
 ↑ Hu & White (19970420), p. 568–9
 ↑ Papantonopoulos (20050324), p. 63
 ↑ ^{27.0} ^{27.1} Jedamzik, Katalinić & Olinto (19960613), p. 1–2
 ↑ Kaiser & Silk (19861211), p. 533
 ↑ Hu & Sugiyama (19940728), p. 2
 ↑ Sunyaev & Zel'dovich (Sept. 1980), p. 1
 ↑ Brandenburg, Enqvist & Olesen (January 1997), p. 2
Bibliography
 Brandenburg, Axel (199701). "The effect of Silk damping on primordial magnetic fields". Physics Letters B. 392 (34): 395–402. arXiv:hepph/9608422 . Bibcode:1997PhLB..392..395B. doi:10.1016/S03702693(96)015663. Retrieved 20080816. Unknown parameter
coauthors=
ignored (help); Check date values in:date=
(help)  Bonometto, S. (20011215). Modern Cosmology (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 416. ISBN 0750308109. Unknown parameter
coauthors=
ignored (help)  A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue MISSING LINK..
 Harrison, E. R. (19700515). "Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology". Physical Review D. 1 (10): 2726. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...1.2726H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2726. Retrieved 20090314.
 A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue MISSING LINK..
 A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue MISSING LINK..
 A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue MISSING LINK..
 A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue MISSING LINK..
 Hu, Wayne (19970420). "The Damping Tail of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies". The Astrophysical Journal. 479 (2): 568–579. arXiv:astroph/9609079 . Bibcode:1997ApJ...479..568H. doi:10.1086/303928. Unknown parameter
coauthors=
ignored (help)  A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue MISSING LINK..
 Jetzer, Ph. (20020731). Matter in the Universe. Space Sciences Series of ISSI. Rudolf von Steiger (ed.). Springer. p. 328. ISBN 1402006667. Unknown parameter
coauthors=
ignored (help)  A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue MISSING LINK..
 Kaiser, Nick (19861211). "Cosmic microwave background anisotropy". Nature. 324 (6097): 529–537. Bibcode:1986Natur.324..529K. doi:10.1038/324529a0. Unknown parameter
coauthors=
ignored (help)  Liddle, Andrew R. (20000413). Cosmological Inflation and LargeScale Structure. Cambridge University Press. p. 400. ISBN 0521575982. Unknown parameter
coauthors=
ignored (help)  Longair, Malcolm S. (20080108). Galaxy Formation (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 738. ISBN 3540734775.
 Madsen, Mark S. (19960515). Dynamic Cosmos (1 ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. p. 144. ISBN 0412623005.
 Partridge, R. B. (19950929). 3K: The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. Cambridge University Press. p. 393. ISBN 0521352541.
 Padmanabhan, T. (19930625). Structure Formation in the Universe. Cambridge University Press. p. 499. ISBN 0521424860.
 Rich, James (20010615). Fundamentals of Cosmology (1 ed.). Springer. p. 302. ISBN 3540413502.
 Ryden, Barbara (20021112). Introduction to Cosmology. Addison Wesley. p. 300. ISBN 0805389121.
 Silk, Joseph (19680201). "Cosmic BlackBody Radiation and Galaxy Formation". Astrophysical Journal. 151: 459. Bibcode:1968ApJ...151..459S. doi:10.1086/149449.
 Papantonopoulos, E. (20050324). The Physics of the Early Universe (1 ed.). Springer. p. 300. ISBN 3540227121.
 Sunyaev, R. A. (Sept 1980). "Microwave background radiation as a probe of the contemporary structure and history of the universe". Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics. 18 (1): 537–560. Bibcode:1980ARA&A..18..537S. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.002541. Unknown parameter
coauthors=
ignored (help); Check date values in:date=
(help)
External links